Skip to content
Home » HR Industry Articles » HR Managers Guide to Section 280G

HR Managers Guide to Section 280G

    Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code is a crucial yet complex area that HR managers must navigate, particularly during mergers, acquisitions, or significant corporate changes. Understanding Section 280G, commonly known as the “Golden Parachute” rule, is essential to ensure compliance, avoid costly penalties, and strategically manage executive compensation packages. This article will provide an overview of Section 280G, the types of payments and benefits it covers, and the tax implications for companies and their executives.

    Overview of Section 280G

    Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) was introduced as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1984. Its primary purpose is to address the issue of excessive executive compensation during corporate transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions, and other significant changes in ownership or control. The provision aims to discourage excessive “golden parachute” payments that could potentially harm shareholders’ interests and destabilize the company’s financial health.

    The Rationale Behind Section 280G

    The rationale for Section 280G stems from concerns over corporate governance and the potential conflicts of interest that can arise during major corporate events. When a company undergoes a change in control, the executives in charge may negotiate lucrative compensation packages for themselves as a condition of the transaction. These golden parachute arrangements can sometimes be disproportionately large compared to the executives’ contributions, leading to negative perceptions and potential financial strain on the company.

    By imposing tax penalties on excessive golden parachute payments, Section 280G aims to align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, ensuring that compensation practices remain reasonable and justifiable.

    Key Definitions and Concepts

    To fully understand Section 280G, HR managers must familiarize themselves with several key definitions and concepts:

    Disqualified Individuals

    Section 280G applies to “disqualified individuals,” a term that encompasses:

    • Officers of the Corporation: This includes executives holding significant management positions, such as the CEO, CFO, and other top officers.
    • Shareholders with Significant Ownership: Individuals who own more than 1% of the outstanding shares of the company fall under this category.
    • Highly Compensated Individuals: Generally, this refers to the top 1% of employees in terms of compensation, though the exact threshold can vary.

    Base Amount

    The base amount is a crucial metric in determining whether payments qualify as golden parachute payments. It represents the average annual compensation of a disqualified individual over the five years preceding the change in control. This base amount serves as a benchmark to assess whether the total parachute payments exceed the allowable limit.

    Excess Parachute Payments

    Golden parachute payments are considered excessive if they exceed three times the base amount. For instance, if an executive’s base amount is $500,000, any payments exceeding $1.5 million would be deemed excessive under Section 280G. These excess amounts are subject to specific tax penalties.

    Compliance and Reporting Requirements

    Section 280G imposes strict compliance and reporting requirements on corporations. Companies must carefully document and disclose all potential golden parachute payments to ensure transparency and adherence to the law. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in severe financial penalties and reputational damage.

    The Impact on Corporate Transactions

    Section 280G significantly impacts the planning and execution of corporate transactions. During mergers, acquisitions, or other changes in control, companies must assess the potential tax implications of executive compensation packages. This assessment often involves detailed calculations, legal reviews, and strategic adjustments to ensure compliance and minimize tax liabilities.

    Strategic Importance for HR Managers

    For HR managers, understanding Section 280G is not just a matter of regulatory compliance; it is also a strategic imperative. By effectively navigating the complexities of golden parachute rules, HR professionals can:

    • Ensure Fair Compensation Practices: Align executive compensation with the company’s financial health and shareholder interests.
    • Mitigate Tax Liabilities: Implement strategies to avoid or minimize tax penalties, preserving the company’s financial resources.
    • Maintain Employee Morale and Retention: Design compensation packages that are attractive and equitable, fostering a positive work environment even during corporate transitions.
    Payments and Benefits Covered by the Golden Parachute Rules

    Payments and Benefits Covered by the Golden Parachute Rules

    Section 280G’s “golden parachute” rules cover a variety of payments and benefits that executives may receive in the event of a change in ownership or control of a corporation. HR managers need to be well-versed in the different types of compensatory arrangements that may be classified under these rules to ensure compliance and avoid unintended tax consequences.

    Types of Covered Payments

    Golden parachute payments under Section 280G are broadly defined and can include several forms of compensation. The key is that these payments are contingent on a change in control. Below are the primary categories of payments and benefits covered by the golden parachute rules:

    Severance Payments

    Severance payments are a common component of executive compensation packages and often become relevant during corporate transitions. These payments are provided to executives when their employment is terminated due to a merger, acquisition, or other changes in control. Severance packages can be structured as lump-sum payments or periodic installments and may include:

    • Cash Payments: Direct monetary compensation provided to the executive upon termination.
    • Salary Continuation: Continued payment of the executive’s salary for a specified period after termination.


    Bonuses awarded to executives as a result of a change in control are also considered golden parachute payments. These can include:

    • Retention Bonuses: Payments designed to incentivize key executives to stay with the company through the transition period.
    • Performance Bonuses: Payments contingent on the company achieving specific performance metrics tied to the change in control.

    Stock Options and Equity Compensation

    Equity-based compensation is another significant component covered under Section 280G. This includes any accelerated vesting or payout of stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), or other equity awards that occur due to the change in control. Key points to consider include:

    • Accelerated Vesting: When an executive’s stock options or RSUs vest more quickly than originally scheduled due to the change in control.
    • Cash-Outs: Situations where executives are given the option to sell their stock options or RSUs for cash during the transaction.

    Retirement Benefits

    Enhanced retirement benefits provided to executives in connection with a change in control can also fall under the golden parachute rules. These benefits may include:

    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs): Additional retirement benefits offered to executives beyond the standard company retirement plans.
    • Pension Enhancements: Increases in pension benefits or accelerated payment schedules tied to the change in control.

    Other Fringe Benefits

    Section 280G also covers a variety of non-cash benefits that executives might receive upon a change in control. These can include:

    • Health Benefits: Continuation of health insurance or other health-related benefits after termination.
    • Perquisites: Benefits such as company cars, club memberships, or housing allowances that are extended or enhanced during the transition.
    • Vacation Payouts: Payment for accrued but unused vacation days.

    Identifying Covered Payments

    Accurately identifying all potential golden parachute payments is crucial for compliance with Section 280G. This involves a thorough review of executive employment agreements, company policies, and the specifics of the corporate transaction. HR managers should work closely with legal and financial advisors to ensure that all compensatory arrangements are appropriately classified and valued.

    Valuation of Payments

    Once the payments and benefits are identified, they must be properly valued to determine if they exceed the Section 280G threshold. The valuation process can be complex, particularly for non-cash benefits and equity compensation. Key steps include:

    1. Calculating the Base Amount: Determine the executive’s base amount, which is the average annual compensation over the preceding five years.
    2. Assessing the Total Payments: Add up all the compensatory payments and benefits that qualify as golden parachute payments.
    3. Comparing to the Safe Harbor Threshold: Compare the total payments to three times the base amount to identify any excess parachute payments.

    Considerations for HR Managers

    HR managers need to consider several strategic and practical aspects when dealing with golden parachute payments:

    • Transparency and Communication: Clearly communicate the terms of the compensation packages to executives and shareholders to maintain trust and avoid misunderstandings.
    • Documentation: Maintain detailed records of all compensation arrangements and the rationale for their classification under Section 280G.
    • Tax Planning: Work with tax advisors to explore potential mitigation strategies, such as restructuring payments or obtaining shareholder approval to avoid the excise tax.

    Example Case

    Consider a scenario where a company, ABC Corp., is being acquired. The CEO, who has a base amount of $600,000, is entitled to a severance package worth $2 million, an accelerated stock option vesting worth $500,000, and a $100,000 retention bonus. The total parachute payment is $2.6 million, which exceeds three times the base amount ($1.8 million). Therefore, $800,000 of the payment would be considered an excess parachute payment, subject to the 20% excise tax for the executive and non-deductible for the company.

    Tax Implications of Section 280G

    Tax Implications of Section 280G

    The tax implications of Section 280G are significant and can have substantial financial consequences for both companies and their executives. These rules are designed to discourage excessive golden parachute payments during corporate transitions by imposing hefty tax penalties. Understanding these tax implications is crucial for HR managers to navigate the complexities of executive compensation packages effectively.

    Corporate Tax Deductions

    One of the primary tax implications of Section 280G is the loss of corporate tax deductions for excess parachute payments. Under the rules, any payment that exceeds the safe harbor threshold is non-deductible by the corporation. This can lead to a considerable increase in the company’s tax burden, impacting its overall financial health.

    Calculation of Non-Deductible Amount

    To determine the non-deductible amount, companies must first calculate the base amount for each disqualified individual. The base amount is the average annual compensation of the executive over the five years preceding the change in control. Any compensatory payments that exceed three times this base amount are classified as excess parachute payments and are not deductible.

    For example, if an executive’s base amount is $500,000, the safe harbor limit would be $1.5 million. If the executive receives $2 million in parachute payments, the excess $500,000 would be non-deductible.

    Excise Tax on Executives

    In addition to the loss of corporate tax deductions, Section 280G imposes a 20% excise tax on the excess parachute payments received by disqualified individuals. This excise tax is levied in addition to the regular income tax that the executive must pay, significantly increasing the tax liability of the affected individuals.

    Example of Excise Tax Impact

    Consider an executive with a base amount of $400,000 who receives parachute payments totaling $1.6 million in connection with a change in control. The safe harbor limit would be $1.2 million (three times the base amount). The excess parachute payment, which is $400,000 ($1.6 million – $1.2 million), would be subject to the 20% excise tax, resulting in an additional tax liability of $80,000 for the executive.

    Shareholder Approval to Avoid Tax Penalties

    One method to avoid the adverse tax consequences of Section 280G is to obtain shareholder approval for the excess parachute payments. If at least 75% of the voting shareholders approve the payments, they are excluded from the definition of excess parachute payments, thus avoiding the 20% excise tax and preserving the corporate tax deduction.

    Process of Obtaining Shareholder Approval

    1. Disclosure: The company must provide full disclosure of the details of the parachute payments to all voting shareholders. This includes the amount, timing, and recipients of the payments.
    2. Vote: A vote is conducted where at least 75% of the shareholders must approve the payments. It is important to note that only disinterested shareholders—those who are not receiving the parachute payments—are allowed to vote.

    While obtaining shareholder approval can mitigate the tax impact, it may not always be feasible due to practical or strategic reasons. Additionally, the process requires transparency and effective communication with shareholders, which can be challenging during the high-stakes environment of a corporate takeover.

    Gross-Up Payments

    To offset the burden of the excise tax on executives, some companies choose to provide gross-up payments. A gross-up payment is an additional amount paid to the executive to cover the cost of the excise tax, ensuring that the executive receives the intended net amount after taxes.

    Pros and Cons of Gross-Up Payments

    • Pros:
      • Maintains the attractiveness of the compensation package for executives.
      • Helps retain key executives during the transition period.
    • Cons:
      • Increases the total cost of the compensation package.
      • Can be perceived negatively by shareholders and the public.
      • Does not mitigate the loss of the corporate tax deduction for excess payments.

    Due to these drawbacks, gross-up payments have become less common, and many companies are moving towards restructuring compensation packages to avoid triggering the excise tax in the first place.

    Restructuring Compensation Packages

    To avoid the pitfalls of Section 280G, HR managers can work with legal and financial advisors to restructure executive compensation packages. This may involve:

    • Deferring Payments: Adjusting the timing of payments so that they are not triggered by the change in control.
    • Reducing Payments: Bringing total compensation within the safe harbor limit to avoid excess parachute payments.
    • Alternative Compensation: Offering alternative forms of compensation that do not trigger Section 280G, such as increased long-term incentives tied to company performance.

    Strategic Planning and Compliance

    Effective planning and compliance are crucial to manage the tax implications of Section 280G. HR managers should:

    1. Conduct Thorough Reviews: Regularly review and assess executive compensation agreements to identify potential issues.
    2. Engage Experts: Work with tax, legal, and financial advisors to navigate the complexities of Section 280G and develop compliant compensation strategies.
    3. Communicate Clearly: Maintain clear communication with executives and shareholders to manage expectations and obtain necessary approvals.


    The tax implications of Section 280G are significant and multifaceted, affecting both corporations and their executives. By understanding the rules, calculating potential liabilities, and implementing strategic measures, HR managers can effectively navigate these challenges. Ensuring compliance with Section 280G not only helps avoid substantial tax penalties but also supports fair and sustainable executive compensation practices during critical corporate transitions.